Edition 2020

Photo description: Two women sitting at the prescribed distance from each other in front of an unused restaurant patio.

What is the impact of coronavirus?

2020 will above all be remembered as the year in which the coronavirus crisis erupted. What started as a medical emergency soon became a crisis affecting many aspects of life. The all-embracing effect of the pandemic and the measures taken to combat it are clearly evident from the Well-being in times of coronavirus dashboard launched by CBS.

What is the impact of coronavirus?2019202020006000*1 000*1 00020200152020401002015=100202095115week 2201520152015AverageAverageAverageMortalityRegistered crimesMarriage and partnershipregistrationsGross domestic product
2020800095002015=100202080120mln20200102015=100202080120*1 0002015201520152015AverageAverageAverageAverageActive labour forceMotor fuel salesConsumptionPassengers at airports of nationalsignificance

A great deal happened all at once following the partial lockdown in March. A number of sectors were closed down, while in others employees started working from home in huge numbers. Public transport was largely avoided, and road traffic also declined sharply. Air traffic had already been grounded. Registered crime decreased and far fewer marriages and partnerships were entered into than was usual for springtime. The economy experienced an unprecedented contraction.

In the Netherlands we are now in the second wave of the coronavirus pandemic. The medical emergency is not over, nor is the economic one. Several areas of life had already sprung back to former levels by the end of the summer, such as registered crime and the number of marriages and registered partnerships. However, this was by no means the case for other areas, such as air traffic or total consumption. Furthermore, the second wave,

and the measures taken to combat it, are already affecting various aspects of life. For example, the number of people boarding public transport this summer was already close to 2019 levels, but is once more far below that. For some time, the roads were almost as busy as they had been in 2019, but that situation is again receding further and further away.

Mortality higher than in 2018

Every year more people die in winter than in the other seasons, especially when there is a flu epidemic. In 2018, the flu epidemic lasted as long as eighteen weeks. At that time, over 9 thousand more people died than normal for that period. This is referred to as ‘excess mortality’.

In the first nine weeks of the current coronavirus pandemic, it is estimated that the excess mortality amounted to almost 9 thousand people. Cause-of-death certificates show that the excess mortality in this period was entirely caused by COVID-19. The excess mortality is therefore about the same as during the flu epidemic in 2018, but the number of deaths was reached in only half the time. Measures were also taken to limit contact between people. Furthermore, the coronavirus pandemic has not yet run its course. Since the end of September we have again been seeing excess mortality, coinciding with the second wave in the Netherlands. Total mortality in the first ten months of 2020 is much higher than in the same months in previous years. Compared to 2018, the difference amounted to 8.5 thousand.

Deaths
week1) 2020 2019 2018 2017
2 3364 3262 3359 3637
3 3157 3152 3364 3487
4 3046 3179 3322 3626
5 3162 3139 3403 3574
6 3193 3183 3513 3446
7 3199 3254 3660 3417
8 2959 3220 3691 3328
9 3097 3065 3937 3152
10 3104 3172 4092 3054
11 3217 3225 3733 2843
12 3615 3043 3430 2778
13 4459 3013 3225 2850
14 5084 2898 3040 2764
15 4979 2902 2860 2810
16 4303 3036 2760 2713
17 3907 2956 2663 2778
18 3378 2806 2645 2769
19 2986 2772 2641 2802
20 2774 2821 2606 2801
21 2770 2873 2674 2772
22 2726 2730 2776 2701
23 2682 2734 2679 2624
24 2691 2647 2557 2643
25 2694 2692 2601 2627
26 2659 2836 2619 2691
27 2636 2725 2726 2697
28 2618 2761 2671 2520
29 2526 2586 2704 2674
30 2672 3006 2767 2571
31 2659 2731 2760 2510
32 2638 2629 2745 2657
33 3206 2613 2605 2540
34 2845 2617 2612 2545
35 2731 2783 2527 2576
36 2679 2553 2613 2570
37 2733 2642 2539 2707
38 2710 2580 2706 2715
39 2881 2751 2696 2669
40 2988 2717 2806 2641
41 2996 2912 2760 2763
42 3224 2879 2739 2706
43 . 2867 2671 2676
44 . 2856 2815 2726
45 . 3015 2798 2797
46 . 3060 2761 2916
47 . 3023 2859 2917
48 . 3045 2907 2886
49 . 3018 2968 3027
50 . 3161 3017 3218
51 . 3253 3041 3079
1) To show only full weeks, weeks 1, 52 and 53 are not included.

Economy hit unusually hard

The economy has been especially hard hit by the fight against the coronavirus. After a contraction by 1.7 percent in the first quarter, the Dutch economy shrank by 8.5 percent in the second quarter, relative to the previous quarter. This was the most severe contraction ever recorded. These two quarters of contraction have wiped out five years of economic growth.

Compared to other European countries, however, the Dutch economy got off lightly. The German economy shrank by 9.7 percent in the second quarter, the Belgian economy by 12.1 percent and the French economy by 13.8 percent. Within the European Union, the Spanish economy was hit hardest, with a contraction of 17.8 percent in the second quarter. Finland was the least affected. But the Finnish economy also shrank, by 4.4 percent. The graph of GDP development from 2017 onwards clearly shows how unprecedented the situation is. The fluctuations in the quarterly development and the differences between countries before 2020 pale into insignificance when compared to what came afterwards. The first two quarters of 2020 saw an exceptional contraction, one which differed greatly from country to country.

Gross domestic product (year-on-year % volume change)
Finland Netherlands Germany Belgium France Spain
2017 Q1, 2017 97,0 94,4 97,0 96,1 95,8 94,0
2017 Q2, 2017 97,4 95,2 97,6 96,4 96,5 95,0
2017 Q3, 2017 97,8 95,9 98,5 96,5 97,1 95,6
2017 Q4, 2017 99,0 96,7 99,3 97,2 97,9 96,2
2018 Q1, 2018 99,1 97,1 99,1 97,4 98,0 96,7
2018 Q2, 2018 99,0 97,7 99,6 97,7 98,2 97,1
2018 Q3, 2018 99,2 97,9 99,3 97,9 98,6 97,7
2018 Q4, 2018 99,6 98,3 99,6 98,7 99,3 98,3
2019 Q1, 2019 99,9 98,8 100,2 98,8 99,8 98,8
2019 Q2, 2019 100,8 99,2 99,7 99,1 100,0 99,2
2019 Q3, 2019 100,6 99,5 100,0 99,5 100,2 99,6
2019 Q4, 2019 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0
2020 Q1, 2020 98,6 98,5 98,0 96,5 94,1 94,8
2020 Q2, 2020 94,3 90,1 88,5 84,8 81,1 77,9
Source: Eurostat.
Adjusted for seasonal influences and any working-day effects.

The questions

Colophon

This web publication was developed by Statistics Netherlands (CBS) in cooperation with Textcetera The Hague.
If you have a question or comment about this publication, please contact us.

Disclaimer and copyright

Cookies

On this website, CBS uses functional cookies on this website to allow proper functioning of the site. These cookies do not contain personal user data and have minimal or no consequences for your privacy. In addition, CBS uses analytical cookies to track visitor statistics, including the number of page views, which topics users are searching, and how visitors reach our website. The purpose is to gain insight into the functioning of the website in order to improve your user experience. We minimise traceability of visitors to our website as much as possible by anonymising the final octet (group of eight bits) of each IP address. These data are not shared with other parties. CBS does not use tracking cookies. Tracking cookies are cookies that track visitors during their browsing of other websites.

The functional and analytical cookies have minimal or no consequences for your privacy. In accordance with current regulations, these cookies may be placed without prior consent.

More information (in Dutch only): https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/telecommunicatie/vraag-en-antwoord/mag-een-website-ongevraagd-cookies-plaatsen

Explanation of symbols

Explanation of symbols
Symbol Explanation
Empty cell figure not applicable
. figure is unknown, insufficiently reliable or confidential
* provisional figure
** revised provisional figure
(between two numbers) inclusive
0 (0.0) less than half of unit concerned
2016–2017 2016 to 2017 inclusive
2016/2017 average for the years 2016 up to and including 2017
2016/’17 crop year, financial year, school year etc., beginning in 2016 and ending in 2017
2004/’05–2016/’17 crop year etc. 2004/’05 up to and including 2016/’17

Due to rounding, some totals may not correspond to the sum of the separate figures.

About CBS

CBS responds to developments in Dutch society by providing statistical information as facts that matter, and communicates on these facts with the outside world. In doing so, CBS offers insights into current developments in society and helps answer policy questions. Research at CBS is focused on broad trends in society and how these are interrelated.

CBS has offices in The Hague, Heerlen and Bonaire with altogether approximately 2,000 staff. A society-oriented working attitude is essential to CBS. CBS provides figures which are relevant to society. Every year, CBS publishes around 600 statistical studies. Virtually every day, CBS data and figures are communicated to the outside world via news releases, video messages and through social media. This results in some 50,000 articles per year in daily newspapers and on news sites.

For more information on CBS’s tasks, organisation and publications, go to cbs.nl/en-gb.

Contact

Should you have any questions or need more information, please contact us.

Contributors

Concept & image editing

Irene van Kuik

Infographics

Anne Blaak

Janneke Hendriks

Richard Jollie

Hendrik Zuidhoek

Editing

Ronald van der Bie

Kees Groenenboom

Annelie Hakkenes-Tuinman

Michel van Kooten

Sidney Vergouw

Paul de Winden

Elma Wobma

Karolien van Wijk

Gert Jan Wijma

Translators

Gabriëlle de Vet

Frans Dinnissen

Final editing

Annelie Hakkenes-Tuinman

We thank all other colleagues who have contributed to this edition of The Netherlands in Numbers.