Photo description: Aerial photograph of combine harvester in wheat field during the harvest, Ukraine.

Major developments in 2021 and 2022

Authors: Sarah Creemers, Daniël Herbers, Marjolijn Jaarsma, Pascal Ramaekers, Janneke Rooyakkers

Development in price, volume and trade value of some key import products from Russia and Ukraine, in March and April 2022. +41% -60% -51% +31% -74% +103% +88% -7% +170% +38% +93% N i c k e l f r o m R u s s i a -69% D e v e l o p m e n t s i n k e y i m p o r t s , M a r ch- A p ril 2022 v s. M a r ch- A p ril 2021 Pri c e W eight V alue Pri c e Pri c e W eight V alue Pri c e W eight V alue W eight V alue

This chapter focuses on important current developments; events and shocks that will have an impact on the Dutch economy in 2022. The war in Ukraine is the first striking news event. First and foremost, the war has dramatic consequences for the lives of people in Ukraine. As regards the economy, the whole world is feeling the effects of the war to a greater or lesser extent. In the first section, we discuss the effects of the war on the Dutch goods trade, and the second section deals with the high inflation in the Netherlands and worldwide, which is partly due to the war but also has other causes. Sections 2.4 and 2.5 look at economic shocks that have already affected the Dutch economy for some time: the coronavirus crisis and Brexit.

2.1Key findings

War

Dutch goods exports to Ukraine and Russia have fallen sharply in value since March 2022. The value of exports to Ukraine in March was 84% lower than in the same month of 2021 and for Russia, the export value contracted by 67%. In April, this decline was smaller compared to April 2021, at 48% for Ukraine and 62% for Russia.

The value of imports from Ukraine also fell dramatically, by 10% in March and 79% in April 2022 compared to the same months in 2021. It is a somewhat different story for the import value from Russia, where decreasing import volumes have been strongly offset by sharply increasing import prices, especially of mineral fuels.

Prices

Shortages, disrupted value chains and strong demand for certain products following the coronavirus crisis have caused prices to soar worldwide. Inflation has surged since the end of 2021: in April 2022, consumer prices were almost 10% up on April 2021; manufacturing output prices were even up by 29% on average than a year earlier. These high output prices then push consumer inflation up further. Import prices were therefore much higher, which many industrial producers (such as in the petroleum industry, chemical industry and food industry) incorporated into their selling prices.

Coronavirus crisis

The coronavirus crisis, which broke out in March 2020, had an acute and major impact on the Dutch economy. GDP contracted severely and the international trade in goods and services also declined sharply. The recovery of the goods trade in particular was equally quick and robust. By Q4 2020, import and export volumes of goods already exceeded pre-pandemic levels. However, trade in services did not recover from the initial shock in 2020 and much of 2021, but sank even deeper. Travel restrictions and the resulting sharp drop in international travel, were an important reason for this decline, along with a decrease in specific flows of services as a result of changes in tax regulations in the Netherlands. See also Chapter 4 of this publication. Import and export volumes of the service trade improved in Q1 2022.

Brexit

Brexit has so far mainly affected transit good flows (re-exports and quasi-transit trade) via the Netherlands to the UK. In the first four months of 2022, the level of transit trade was as much as 27% below that of 2015. The picture is very different for domestic exports, which were no less than 30% above the level of 2015 in 2022.

2.2Sharp decline in Dutch exports to Ukraine and Russia

The war in Ukraine, which started on 24 February 2022, has clearly had an impact on the Dutch goods trade with both Ukraine and Russia. In March, Dutch goods exports to both countries plummeted. Exports to Ukraine were 84% lower in March 2022 than in March 2021, and exports to Russia were 67% lower (see also CBS, 2022a). In April, the declines were smaller: 48% lower for Ukraine and 62% lower for Russia, compared to April 2021 (Figure 2.2.1).

Value of imports from Russia actually considerably higher than in 2021

Imports from Ukraine and Russia simultaneously show reductions in import volume and sharp increases in import prices. Compared to March 2021, imports from Ukraine fell by 31% in weight in March 2022, but the value remained fairly stable due to the sharp price rises for maize and sunflower seed oil, for example. In April 2022, the import volume collapsed completely, which explains a 79% drop in the import value compared to April 2021.

The value of imports from Russia is still high, which can be explained by the high oil and gas prices. However, the increase in the import value in April (+61% compared to April 2021) was considerably lower than the increase in March (+115% compared to March 2021). This is also due to declining import volumes. The import from Russia in April 2022 was about 16% lower in weight than in April 2021; in March it was still 2% higher than in March of the previous year.

2.2.1 Import and export value 2022 relative to 20211) (% change relative to 2021)
Type handel January February March April
Imports from Ukraine 47.7 60.4 -9.5 -79.2
Imports from Russia 152.6 91.3 114.8 60.5
Exports to Ukraine 46.8 2.5 -84.1 -48.2
Exports to Russia 18.3 4.9 -67.0 -61.9
1)For the best possible comparison with 2021, quasi-transit trade is included here (trade excluding quasi-transit is available on CBS StatLine).

Imports from Russia much larger than the other three flows combined

In monetary value, the imports from Russia are many times larger than the value of all three flows combined (Figure 2.2.2). This is attributed to the very prominent share of mineral fuels in the imports from Russia. In 2021, no less than 87% of the total import value from Russia consisted of such products (CBS, 2022b). In the first four months of 2022, the Netherlands imported as much as €13.3 billion from Russia, almost double the imports in the same months of 2021. The second flow relates to exports to Russia worth €1.6 billion in the first four months of 2022, followed by imports from Ukraine (€0.6 billion) and exports to Ukraine (declined to €0.3 billion).

2.2.2 Trade value, first four months1) (bn euros)
2022* 2021*
Imports from Ukraine 0.63 0.63
Imports from Russia 13.27 6.62
Exports to Ukraine 0.32 0.44
Exports to Russia 1.61 2.31
1)For the best possible comparison with 2021, quasi-transit trade is included here (trade excluding quasi-transit is available on CBS StatLine).

Metals from Russia have also risen sharply in price

Dutch imports from Russia are thus dominated by mineral fuels. These imports mainly consist of crude oil, but also significant quantities of natural gas, petroleum products and coal. We also observed that the imports from Russia are by far the biggest flow in the goods trade with Russia and Ukraine. The logical consequence is that trade in goods other than mineral fuels is relatively limited. Still, there are other goods that are important for Dutch supply and food chains. Though at a great distance from mineral fuels, Dutch imports from Russia also include a relatively large amount of copper, nickel, aluminium, iron and steel. In the first four months, the import value of these metals from Russia increased considerably which is again related to significant price rises in 2022 (Figure 2.2.3).

Imports from Ukraine are dominated by cereals (mostly maize) and vegetable oils (mostly sunflower seed oil). In 2021, over half of the imports from Ukraine consisted of maize and sunflower seed oil (CBS, 2022c). In the first four months of 2022, the Dutch import value of maize was still well above the level of 2021, because the price increases were greater than the decrease in the weight of the imports.

However, if we look specifically at the two months of war in March and April 2022, we see that the weight of the imports of maize is about 60% below the import level of the same period in 2021 and the value at 51%. In fact, imports of sunflower seed oil from Ukraine even dropped by 74% in weight and 69% in value.

Imports from Russia have decreased much less during the two months of war. For mineral fuels, a 7% decrease applies to March and April in comparison with 2021 and for metals (copper, nickel, aluminium, iron and steel) from Russia it involves a decline of 17%.

2.2.3 Main imports from Russia and Ukraine, excluding mineral fuels, first four months1) (million euros)
2022* 2021*
Imports from Russia . .
Copper (products) 627 328
Nickel (products) 419 166
Iron and steel 286 155
Aluminium (products) 217 38
. .
Imports from Ukraine . .
Cereals 234 191
Vegetable oils 151 169
Oil seeds and oleaginous fruit 44 34
Ores 34 102
1)For the best possible comparison with 2021, quasi-transit trade is included here (trade excluding quasi-transit is available on CBS StatLine).

Sharp decline in exports of machinery and equipment

Dutch exports to Russia and Ukraine particularly include machinery and equipment and pharmaceutical products. Exports of these two goods fell sharply in value in the first four months of 2022 compared to 2021. The reason for this is partly due to the European sanctions against Russia.

2.2.4 Main exports to Russia and Ukraine, first four months1) (million euros)
2022* 2021*
Exports to Russia . .
Machinery and equipment 402 666
Pharmaceutical products 243 403
Scientific instruments 134 144
Plastic(s) (products) 112 110
. .
Exports to Ukraine . .
Machinery and appliances 77 88
Pharmaceutical products 27 90
Road vehicles 26 28
Mineral fuels 17 7
1)For the best possible comparison with 2021, quasi-transit trade is included here (trade excluding quasi-transit is available on CBS StatLine).

2.3Development of trade prices

As a result of increasing demand after the pandemic waves subsided on the one hand, and due to supply difficulties on the other hand, global supply and demand for goods and services are no longer well matched and value chains are disrupted. Prices have risen dramatically in recent months due to new lockdowns in Chinese manufacturing cities and port cities, the war in Ukraine, the reduced cereal exports from that country, uncertainty surrounding future gas supplies, scarcity of food raw materials, chip and container shortages and trade disputes. Inflation has surged since the end of 2021: in April 2022, consumer prices were almost 10% higher than a year earlier (CBS, 2022g). High prices may reduce the purchasing power of consumers, thereby reducing the demand for goods and services and cooling the economy.

Inflation as a result of faltering trade flows, war violence and embargos on oil and gas

Globalisation has contributed to relatively low levels of inflation over the past 20 to 30 years. Today’s upward inflationary pressures are high due to persistent supply difficulties, energy prices and geopolitical tensions, among other things (Meinema, 2022). For many countries, inflation has become a distinct and current issue. Even before the Russia-Ukraine war, the general price level skyrocketed due to the increasing prices of raw materials and imbalances between supply and demand (IMF, 2022; Gourinchas, 2022).

Figure 2.3.1 clearly shows the development of the trade prices. It shows that trade prices in 2020 were below the level of 2015, with the fall in import prices being the greatest. One of the reasons for this is that Dutch imports comprise a relatively large amount of petroleum and petroleum products. As many countries went into lockdown, the demand for petroleum fell and the price plummeted. Moreover, prior to that, there was disagreement among oil-producing countries that led to overproduction and unprecedentedly low prices (RTL News, 2020). Factories were only partially operational during the first pandemic wave, transport was severely curtailed and air traffic came to a virtual standstill. From mid-2021, import and export prices increased in a similar manner. Prices were nearly 25% higher in March 2022 than in they had been in 2015.

2.3.1 Development of trade prices (2015=100)
Imports Exports
2019* January, 2019* 100.1 101.9
2019* February, 2019* 101.7 103
2019* March, 2019* 101.6 102.5
2019* April, 2019* 101.8 102.2
2019* May, 2019* 100.4 103.2
2019* June, 2019* 99.8 101.1
2019* July, 2019* 99.3 101.5
2019* August, 2019* 99.2 100.5
2019* September, 2019* 99.4 100.9
2019* October, 2019* 98.7 100.1
2019* November, 2019* 98.4 99.5
2019* December, 2019* 100.1 100.4
2020* January, 2020* 100 101
2020* February, 2020* 100.4 101.7
2020* March, 2020* 95.9 99.1
2020* April, 2020* 92.3 95.5
2020* May, 2020* 91.5 96.7
2020* June, 2020* 95.1 96.5
2020* July, 2020* 93.5 97.6
2020* August, 2020* 93.8 96.8
2020* September, 2020* 93.4 96.9
2020* October, 2020* 93.4 96.3
2020* November, 2020* 93.6 96.2
2020* December, 2020* 95.7 97.3
2021* January, 2021* 97.1 98.8
2021* February, 2021* 100.6 101.9
2021* March, 2021* 99.7 104.4
2021* April, 2021* 101.1 104.9
2021* May, 2021* 104 107
2021* June, 2021* 107.4 104.9
2021* July, 2021* 106.3 108.2
2021* August, 2021* 108.7 109.2
2021* September, 2021* 109.6 109.6
2021* October, 2021* 113.3 112.5
2021* November, 2021* 115.2 112.9
2021* December, 2021* 114.9 114.1
2022* January, 2022* 119.9 120.9
2022* February, 2022* 122.5 120.2
2022* March, 2022* 123.4 123.7

Raw material prices facing unprecedented levels

A severe shortage of certain raw materials has developed worldwide, partly because stocks were hardly built up during the coronavirus pandemic or were depleted when demand rose sharply again. Supply difficulties and higher transport costs also contributed to the shortage, which led to a price increase in several product groups (Figure 2.3.2). Industrial manufacturers in the Netherlands import a large amount of raw materials and fuels from other countries for their output. While in 2020 many import prices fell due to overcapacity, lower demand caused by the coronavirus crisis and the low oil price, in 2021 and 2022 key imports experienced a sharp price increase. Meat, fruit and vegetables, vegetable oils, cereals, paper, iron and steel and aluminium are some examples of products that have become much more expensive on the global market. Consequently, countries rich in raw materials such as South Africa, Brazil and Russia see their exports and export value grow faster than Europe and the US (Nauta, 2022).

Dutch industrial producers paid 61% more for aluminium from other countries than a year earlier. The price of aluminium is being driven by high demand, among others. In addition, China has closed smelters as a result of lockdowns against local outbreaks of the coronavirus. China is the world’s leading manufacturer of aluminium. In Europe, too, smelters have halted their production because it was no longer profitable to continue due to the high energy prices. Tensions surrounding Ukraine also play a role, as Russia is a major aluminium producing country and any conflict could jeopardise Russian supplies (Nieuws.nl, 2022; Bakker, 2022).

Also, the import of paper pulp became more expensive in 2021 and 2022. There is a shortage of paper pulp due to transport difficulties and the high demand for cardboard as a result of online shopping. Stocks of pulp have fallen sharply worldwide (RTL News, 2022). Pulp is used in diapers, toilet paper and books for example (NOS News, 2021). In April 2021, the import prices of paper pulp were up by 4% on the previous year. In 2022, the price of paper pulp from abroad increased by almost another 30% compared to the previous year.

Also, the price rise of vegetable oils continues: in April 2021, the import prices were up by over 60% on the previous year. In April 2022, Dutch manufacturers paid almost 50% more for vegetable oils from abroad than in April 2021. This price increase is mainly due to the worldwide production shortfall or difficult circumstances for harvesting and exporting (such as the war in Ukraine), low stocks due to previous poor harvests and the worldwide increased consumption of biodiesel (NU, 2021; Engwerda, 2021; Nieuwe Oogst, 2021).

2.3.2 Development of manufacturing import prices (year-on-year % change)
Product April 2020 April 2021 April 2022*
Meat 0.1 3.0 25.1
Fruit and
vegetables
3.5 -3.3 11.6
Vegetable oils 1.2 60.2 49.6
Cereals -3.3 12.1 36.0
Pulp, paper
and cardboard
-7.4 3.9 29.5
Iron and steel -6.4 26.0 60.1
Aluminium -10.3 17.0 61.0

Manufacturing output prices up by 29 percent compared to April 2022

Prices of Dutch-manufactured products at home and abroad were on average 29% higher in April 2021. The increase in manufacturing output prices has been unprecedented since July 2021. In recent months, the war in Ukraine has put additional pressure on prices, on top of the price increases that resulted from the rapid recovery of the economy after the coronavirus crisis (CBS, 2022e). Higher manufacturer prices have also been driving up the inflation rate for consumers. The output prices abroad rose more rapidly than in the Netherlands.

Figure 2.3.3 shows the change in output prices in April 2021 and 2022 compared to the same month a year earlier for the leading industries. First, the prices of fuels and energy have increased substantially. In March 2022, the price of a barrel of North Sea Brent oil was 101 euros, well over 83 percent more than in the previous year (CBS, 2022e). This in turn affects processed products, like fuel for transport, heating of greenhouses or the production of fertilisers. Also in the chemical industry, price increases are strongly affected by changes in the oil prices. Manufacturers of food products, rubber and plastics, and metal products also made hefty increases in their output prices. The price increase was kept at a relative minimum in the machinery industry, the electrotechnical industry and the motor vehicle industry. The sharpest price increases were seen in 2022, but even in 2021 some industries already had significantly higher output prices compared to April 2020.

2.3.3 Output prices by type of industry1) (year-on-year % change)
April 2022* April 2021
Petroleum 108.6 99.5
Chemicals 45 28.8
Food 21.6 5.3
Rubber and plastics 18.7 5.1
Metal products 17.6 2.9
Machinery 6.4 0.9
Electrotechnical products 5 -1.9
Motor vehicles 3.1 1.8
1)The eight industries mentioned account for almost 80 percent of the manufacturing industry.

2.4Developments of the Dutch economy and the international trade since the coronavirus crisis

The year 2021 has turned out to be another eventful one for the Dutch economy and society. At the start of that year, the Netherlands was still under one of the severest lockdowns to curb the coronavirus pandemic. As early as 13 October 2020, new response measures to the coronavirus were imposed, which became progressively stricter over the course of autumn and winter and began to have an increasing impact on daily life. From 23 January to 28 April 2021, the Netherlands even went into a full lockdown with a nationwide curfew to further curb the spread of the virus. The full lockdown, the shutdown of entire industries, such as the accommodation and food services and culture sector as well as the travel restrictions, stalled the recovery of the Dutch economy in the winter of 2020/2021. There was no economic growth in the fourth quarter of 2020 compared to the previous quarter, and in the first quarter of 2021, GDP only showed a 0.1% growth. Thus, at the beginning of 2021, the economy was still 3.5% smaller than at the end of 2019, just before the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic (Figure 2.4.1).

2.4.1 GDP development (volume, seasonally adjusted) (2015 = 100)
GDP development
2015 Q1, 2015 100
2015 Q2, 2015 100.3
2015 Q3, 2015 100.7
2015 Q4, 2015 100.7
2016 Q1, 2016 101.6
2016 Q2, 2016 101.8
2016 Q3, 2016 103.0
2016 Q4, 2016 103.8
2017 Q1, 2017 104.4
2017 Q2, 2017 105.3
2017 Q3, 2017 106.0
2017 Q4, 2017 106.9
2018 Q1, 2018 107.3
2018 Q2, 2018 108.0
2018 Q3, 2018 108.3
2018 Q4, 2018 108.7
2019 Q1, 2019 109.5
2019 Q2, 2019 109.9
2019 Q3, 2019 110.4
2019 Q4, 2019 110.8
2020 Q1, 2020 109.2
2020 Q2, 2020 100.6
2020 Q3, 2020 106.9
2020 Q4, 2020 106.9
2021* Q1, 2021* 106.9
2021* Q2, 2021* 111.0
2021* Q3, 2021* 112.7
2021* Q4, 2021* 113.5
2022* Q1, 2022* 114.0

GDP nearly 3% more growth in Q1 2022 than before the coronavirus crisis

Q2 2021 was the final turning point in the economic recovery. The full lockdown was gradually being phased out and Dutch society opened up again. GDP saw a 3.8% growth in Q2, mainly owing to considerably higher consumer spending, government expenditure and a higher trade surplus. Consequently, the size of the Dutch economy in that quarter was again almost the same as before the coronavirus pandemic. During the next three quarters, the Dutch economy continued to grow at a steady pace. The GDP growth rate was nearly 3% higher in Q1 2022 than before the start of the pandemic. Of course, this did not apply to all industries. For example, in Q1 2022, the value added in the culture and leisure industry was still a fifth smaller than before the coronavirus crisis. In Q1 2022, the manufacturing industry was 6% larger than at the end of 2019, and for the business services industry this was nearly 3%.

2.4.2 Development of goods and service trade (volume, seasonally adjusted) (2019-I = 100)
Goods imports Service imports Goods exports Service exports
2019 Q1, 2019 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
2019 Q2, 2019 101.1 103.0 100.6 104.2
2019 Q3, 2019 103.1 102.7 102.0 104.4
2019 Q4, 2019 104.4 97.2 102.8 101.6
2020* Q1, 2020* 99.5 102.2 99.9 103.4
2020* Q2, 2020* 92.6 86.4 91.6 88.7
2020* Q3, 2020* 101.5 87.2 101.2 90.3
2020* Q4, 2020* 104.9 83.6 104.2 85.8
2021* Q1, 2021* 104.3 81.8 104.8 84.4
2021* Q2, 2021* 108.1 78.8 108.1 84.9
2021* Q3, 2021* 109.7 87.8 108.6 95.0
2021* Q4, 2021* 111.1 79.6 109.4 89.2
2022* Q1, 2022* 106.0 91.5 106.0 97.4

Sharp contraction and quick recovery of the goods trade

The volume of the Dutch trade in both goods and services contracted rapidly at the beginning of the coronavirus crisis, as shown by Figure 2.4.2. Q2 2020 was the low point for goods trade with both the goods imports and exports about 11% smaller in volume than in Q4 2019. The relatively quick recovery of the global trade in goods was also keenly felt in the Netherlands. By Q4 2020, import and export volumes already exceeded pre-pandemic levels. Despite new pandemic waves at home and abroad, the volume of the goods trade continued to grow steadily throughout 2021. The volume of the Dutch goods trade was under pressure during Q1 2022. A possible cause of this are the imbalances and the worldwide shortages and difficulties in logistics chains, high prices, new lockdowns in China and the economically unstable situation after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Big blow for the trade in services and slow recovery

The impact of the coronavirus crisis on the international trade in services was initially of a similar order to the goods trade. The volume of services exports was almost 13% smaller in Q1 2020 than at the end of 2019, the volume of imports being 11% smaller. Unlike goods trade, trade in services did not recover, but sank even deeper. Travel restrictions related to the coronavirus crisis and the resulting sharp drop in international travel, were an important reason for this decline, along with a decrease in specific flows of services as a result of changes in tax regulations in the Netherlands. See also Chapter 4 of this publication. The volume of services exports was almost 6% smaller in Q1 2022 than before the start of the coronavirus crisis, and the volume of imports was 10% smaller. However, imports of services are already higher in value than in 2019 (CBS, 2022h).

Import value from China in 2021 25% above level of 2019

Figure 2.4.3 shows the development of the Dutch import value of goods from the main importing countries since the start of the coronavirus crisis. Imports of goods from China developed differently from imports from neighbouring countries and other imports in both coronavirus years. The coronavirus outbreak began in China, and China responded by a full lockdown for all affected areas. Chinese exports, including to the Netherlands, contracted substantially, however, quickly recovered in the spring of 2020. By July 2020, the import value from China had already returned to its pre-crisis level (the average of the import values in 2019 has been taken for this). Like the Netherlands, our neighbouring countries were hit by the coronavirus crisis a little later in the winter and the lockdowns lagged a few months behind China. The contraction in goods imports from Germany and Belgium (and imports from all other countries) particularly decreased in April and May of 2020. These imports also quickly recovered afterwards, though still remained below the level of 2019. Even if not everyone actually went on holiday in 2020, August is a holiday month and is generally characterised by a lower level of trade.noot1

In early 2021, imports from China were also under pressure, possibly due to resurgent coronavirus figures and added caution in the run-up to the Winter Olympics (Reuters, 2022). Europe’s winter of 2020/2021 was also difficult with the emergence of the Delta variant of the coronavirus and renewed strict lockdowns. In March 2021, the recovery in trade finally took hold and goods imports picked up again. Over the whole of 2021, the import value from China was a quarter higher than in 2019, compared to 17% import growth from Germany, 15% growth in goods imports from Belgium and 12% growth in imports from the non-top 3 partner countries. In the winter and spring of 2022, China was again hit by mounting disease numbers, and the Zero-Covid policy was again depressing Chinese exports and now also economic growth (Bloomberg, 2022).

2.4.3 Development of import value from Germany, Belgium, China and other countries (2019 = 100)
Jaar Maand Germany Belgium China Other countries
2020 Jan, 2020 125.1 97.2 115.2 118.9
2020 Feb, 2020 119.0 91.9 86.0 110.6
2020 Mar, 2020 127.6 95.7 81.4 117.0
2020 Apr, 2020 102.8 75.6 93.2 92.8
2020 May, 2020 99.4 77.2 101.0 91.0
2020 Jun, 2020 120.6 92.9 112.0 104.0
2020 Jul, 2020 116.7 90.3 114.8 102.7
2020 Aug, 2020 106.2 84.8 103.0 94.5
2020 Sep, 2020 129.3 92.9 113.7 108.7
2020 Oct, 2020 127.4 97.2 111.3 109.5
2020 Nov, 2020 129.8 96.7 113.8 111.8
2020 Dec, 2020 128.6 104.6 105.5 113.0
2021* Jan, 2021* 125.0 91.8 108.1 103.4
2021* Feb, 2021* 130.5 92.3 97.1 109.2
2021* Mar, 2021* 154.6 112.0 118.6 137.3
2021* Apr, 2021* 141.1 105.4 111.3 128.0
2021* May, 2021* 136.1 110.0 110.7 121.8
2021* Jun, 2021* 150.3 117.5 117.5 133.8
2021* Jul, 2021* 142.3 116.2 121.3 131.5
2021* Aug, 2021* 134.1 110.2 131.1 131.6
2021* Sep, 2021* 152.5 129.3 138.9 138.8
2021* Oct, 2021* 151.5 125.4 129.7 149.0
2021* Nov, 2021* 165.0 137.6 151.8 160.8
2021* Dec, 2021* 173.1 135.2 159.6 152.8

2.5Brexit makes transit trade in goods less appealing

Main trading partners of the Netherlands in the first quarter of 2022 compared to the same period in 2015, including quasi-transit trade. Germa n y 1 2 3 4 5 6 Belgium China F r an c e United S tates Germa n y 1 2 3 4 5 6 Belgium China Russia United S tates Q1 2015 Q1 2022 Germa n y 1 2 3 4 5 6 Belgium Ita l y F r an c e United S tates Q1 2015 Germa n y 1 2 3 4 5 6 Belgium F r an c e Ita l y United S tates Q1 2022 I m p o r t s i n cl. qu a si-t r a n s i t t r ad e Exp o r t s i n cl. qu a si-t r a n s i t t r ad e UK UK UK UK

On 31 January 2020, the United Kingdom had already formally exited the European Union, followed by a transitional period during which the UK continued to comply with European trade rules. This decision was taken in order to avoid acute trade disruptions after Brexit and to have time available to lay down the new trade rules in a trade agreement. That transitional period ended on 31 December 2020. On 1 January 2021, Brexit became effective with the application of new rules on trade between the United Kingdom and the EU (European Commission, 2021).

Fewer goods via the Netherlands to the UK after Brexit...

UK’s withdrawal from the EU has particularly affected goods originating from non-EU countries being transported via the Netherlands to other countries (see: re-exports and quasi-transit trade). In the first four months of 2022, these re-exports and quasi-transit goods flows are significantly below the level of the years 2015 to 2020 (Figure 2.5.1 Goods flow ‘Via the Netherlands to the UK). In 2015, the year leading up to the Brexit referendum, 27% more goods in terms of value passed through our country across the North Sea than in 2022. Goods that are not produced in the EU or in the UK and which are shipped via the Netherlands to the United Kingdom will namely be taxed twice because of Brexit. Moreover, traders also have to deal with customs formalities and controls, if any, twice (CBS, 2021a). This has made it much more appealing for British companies to import goods directly without a stopover in the Netherlands. The total transit trade of goods via the Netherlands to all destinations has in fact increased significantly in value during the same period.

2.5.1 Development of goods trade, first four months1) (2015-I=100)
Exports via the Netherlands to the UK Exports via the Netherlands total Domestic exports to the UK Domestic exports total
2015 100 100 100 100
2016 96 98 114 95
2017 99 115 107 107
2018 102 120 101 113
2019 114 127 117 118
2020 90 122 90 110
2021 52 132 121 126
2022 73 174 130 152
1)'Exports via the Netherlands' is equivalent to the sum of re-exports and quasi-transit trade (for the best possible comparison over time).

... However more domestic exports to the UK

Domestic exports to the United Kingdom also lag behind the total domestic exports in terms of development (percentage growth), but the differences here are much smaller than for transit trade flows.noot2 In the first four months of 2022, the value of domestic exports to the UK was as much as 30% above the level of 2015, whereas this was 27% lower for transit trade. Possible explanations for the persistently high level of domestic exports to the UK in 2021 and 2022 are, on the one hand, the high prices for products sold to the UK (such as chemicals and mineral fuels) and, on the other hand, the fact that various trade-restrictive measures (especially in agriculture) will not be introduced until later this year (Jukema et al., 2022).

Hardly any growth in exports of food and beverages

Figure 2.5.2 shows that the export value of Dutch food and beverages to the United Kingdom was at a slightly higher level (+6%) in the first four months of 2022 than in the same period in 2015, the year leading up to the Brexit referendum. CBS previously reported that Dutch companies exported even fewer fresh fruit and vegetables and perishables, such as peppers, cucumbers, onions and pears to the UK in 2021 than in 2020 (CBS, 2021b). Now that the UK is no longer a member of the EU, Dutch exporters have to consider various non-tariff measures and inspections, aside from longer transit times (CBS, 2021a and 2021c). However, a higher value of processed foodstuffs, cattle feed and non-alcoholic beverages was shipped to the UK in the first four months of 2022 than in the same period in 2015, resulting in modest export growth for the food and beverage product group after all.

In the first four months of 2022, the export value of all other product categories was actually much higher than in the same period in 2015. The export value of Dutch chemical products such as medicines and plastics was about 47% higher in 2022 than in the same period in 2015. For manufactured goods (including paper and cardboard, medical instruments and devices, toys), this growth was 20%, for mineral fuels (such as refined petroleum products and electrical energy) this was 24%, for transport equipment (e.g. passenger cars or other motor vehicles) 19%, and for raw materials and natural products as well as machinery and equipment, this was as much as 61%. The product category of raw materials and natural products includes flowers and plants and vegetable oils and fats, for example. In the first four months of 2022, Dutch companies sold over twice as many flowers and plants in terms of value to the UK compared to the same period in 2015. For vegetable oils, it is even almost three times as much. Within the machinery and equipment group, we observe a particular growth in the export of chips and semiconductor elements, electromedical and radiological equipment and office machines to the UK.

2.5.2 Domestic exports to the UK, first four months (million euros)
2022* 2021* 2020 2019 2015
Chemical products 1599 1387 1197 1477 1086
Manufactured goods 1239 1464 970 1196 1033
Raw materials and natural products 856 857 564 681 532
Machinery and equipment 1082 1382 712 855 674
Mineral fuels 1389 772 460 1082 1116
Transport equipment 540 411 471 575 452
Food and beverages 1533 1374 1330 1526 1441

Twice as many business services to the UK as before the referendum

At the same time, the export value of services to the UK increased by 96% to €7.5 billion in Q1 2022 compared to the same quarter in 2015, the year leading up to the Brexit referendum. This is mainly explained by much higher exports of business services (including legal and accounting services) and transport services than in 2015. With a common share of 58%, these types of services are the principal forms of the trade in services to the UK. In comparison with Q1 2015, the expenditure of British tourists and business travellers during their stay in the Netherlands decreased by 60% in 2022.

2.6References

Open references

References

Bakker, K. (2022). Papier en aluminium blijven in prijs stijgen. FoodBusiness.

Bloomberg (2022). China’s export growth weakens to 2020 low as lockdowns bite. Bloomberg.

CBS (2021a). 121 million euros paid in duties on imports from the UK. Statistics Netherlands: The Hague/Heerlen/Bonaire.

CBS (2021b). Fewer food products crossing the Channel. Statistics Netherlands: The Hague/Heerlen/Bonaire.

CBS (2021c). Handel in voeding en dranken onderhevig aan kwaliteit verbeterende regels. Statistics Netherlands: The Hague/Heerlen/Bonaire.

CBS (2021d). Veel doorvoer van goederen, opbrengsten relatief laag. Statistics Netherlands: The Hague/Heerlen/Bonaire.

CBS (2022a). Sharp drop in exports to Ukraine and Russia. Statistics Netherlands: The Hague/Heerlen/Bonaire.

CBS (2022b). 87 percent of imports from Russia are mineral fuels. Statistics Netherlands: The Hague/Heerlen/Bonaire.

CBS (2022c). 84 percent of sunflower oil imports in 2021 came from Ukraine. Statistics Netherlands: The Hague/Heerlen/Bonaire.

CBS (2022d). Inflation rate 9.6 percent in April. Statistics Netherlands: The Hague/Heerlen/Bonaire.

CBS (2022e). Manufacturing output prices 29 percent up in April. Statistics Netherlands: The Hague/Heerlen/Bonaire.

CBS (2022f). International trade; import and export values key figures. [Dataset]. Consulted on 23 June 2022.

CBS (2022g). Producer price index (PPI); output and import prices by product, 2015=100. [Dataset]. Consulted on 23 June 2022.

CBS (2022h). Service imports back at pre-pandemic level. Statistics Netherlands: The Hague/Heerlen/Bonaire.

Engwerda, J. (2021). Koolzaadimport blijft duur voor EU. Food Agribusiness.

European Commission (2021). The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement. European Commission: Brussels/Luxembourg.

Gourinchas, P. O. (2022). War Dims Global Economic Outlook as Inflation Accelerates. IMF Blog.

IMF (2022). World Economic Outlook: War Sets Back the Global Recovery. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

Jukema, G.D., Ramaekers, P. & Berkhout, P. (Red.) (2022). The Dutch agricultural sector in an international context, 2022. Wageningen/Heerlen/The Hague: Wageningen Economic Research and Statistics Netherlands.

Meinema, A. (2022). Alles wordt steeds duurder, wanneer komt er een eind aan? NOS nieuws.

Nauta, H. (2022). De wereldhandel draait op volle toeren: in 2021 versleepten we voor 28,5 biljoen dollar aan goederen. Trouw.

Nieuwe Oogst (2021). Biodieselproductie stuwt vraag naar oliezaden.

Nieuws.nl (2022). Prijs aluminium naar hoogste niveau sinds 2008.

NOS Nieuws (2021). Kerstkaarten mogelijk 25 procent duurder vanwege ‘pulp friction’.

NU (2021). Vrees voor duurdere koolzaadolie en tarwemeel door slechte oogst.

Reuters (2022). China ends 2021 with the worst COVID week since taming original epidemic. Reuters.

RTL Nieuws (2020). Olieprijs in vrije val door conflict tussen Saudi-Arabië en Rusland.

RTL Nieuws (2022). Papierproducent verwacht duurder wc-papier door oorlog in Oekraïne.

Noten

Month-on-month comparisons should be interpreted with caution as these figures are not price or seasonally adjusted.

We observe the same trend on the import side: import value from the UK in 2021 is 28% higher than in 2015; the total import value has increased by 42% in the same period.

Colophon

This web publication was developed by Statistics Netherlands (CBS) in cooperation with Textcetera The Hague.
If you have a question or comment about this publication, please contact us.

Disclaimer and copyright

Cookies

On this website, CBS uses functional cookies on this website to allow proper functioning of the site. These cookies do not contain personal user data and have minimal or no consequences for your privacy. In addition, CBS uses analytical cookies to track visitor statistics, including the number of page views, which topics users are searching, and how visitors reach our website. The purpose is to gain insight into the functioning of the website in order to improve your user experience. We minimise traceability of visitors to our website as much as possible by anonymising the final octet (group of eight bits) of each IP address. These data are not shared with other parties. CBS does not use tracking cookies. Tracking cookies are cookies that track visitors during their browsing of other websites.

The functional and analytical cookies have minimal or no consequences for your privacy. In accordance with current regulations, these cookies may be placed without prior consent.

More information (in Dutch only): https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/telecommunicatie/vraag-en-antwoord/mag-een-website-ongevraagd-cookies-plaatsen

Explanation of symbols

Explanation of symbols

Empty cell figure not applicable
. figure is unknown, insufficiently reliable or confidential
* provisional figure
** revised provisional figure
(between two numbers) inclusive
0 (0.0) less than half of unit concerned
2016–2017 2016 to 2017 inclusive
2016/2017 average for the years 2016 up to and including 2017
2016/’17 crop year, financial year, school year etc., beginning in 2016 and ending in 2017
2004/’05–2016/’17 crop year etc. 2004/’05 up to and including 2016/’17

Due to rounding, some totals may not correspond to the sum of the separate figures.

About CBS

CBS responds to developments in Dutch society by providing statistical information as facts that matter, and communicates on these facts with the outside world. In doing so, CBS offers insights into current developments in society and helps answer policy questions. Research at CBS is focused on broad trends in society and how these are interrelated.

CBS has offices in The Hague, Heerlen and Bonaire with altogether approximately 2,000 staff. A society-oriented working attitude is essential to CBS. CBS provides figures which are relevant to society. Every year, CBS publishes around 600 statistical studies. Virtually every day, CBS data and figures are communicated to the outside world via news releases, video messages and through social media. This results in some 50,000 articles per year in daily newspapers and on news sites.

For more information on CBS’s tasks, organisation and publications, go to cbs.nl/en-gb.

Contact

Should you have any questions or need more information, please contact us.

Contributors

Authors

Nieke Aerts

Marcel van den Berg

Arjen Berkenbos (DNB)

Timon Bohn

Sarah Creemers

Dennis Dahlmans

Hans Draper

Daniël Herbers

Marjolijn Jaarsma

Bart Loog

Angie Mounir

Tom Notten

Tim Peeters

Leen Prenen

Pascal Ramaekers

Janneke Rooyakkers

Iryna Rud

Anne Maaike Stienstra (DNB)

Khee Fung Wong

Editorial team

Sarah Creemers

Daniël Herbers

Marjolijn Jaarsma

Janneke Rooyakkers

Editors in chief

Daniël Herbers

Marjolijn Jaarsma

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the following colleagues for their constructive contributions to this edition of Dutch Trade in Facts and Figures:

Deirdre Bosch

Elijah Cats

Ellen Dukker

Anniek Erkens

Janneke Hendriks

Lico Hoekema

Richard Jollie

Irene van Kuijk

Jeandre Melaria

Davey Poulissen

Jasper Roos

Carla Sebo

Roos Smit

Sandra Vasconcellos

Karolien van Wijk

Hendrik Zuidhoek

Translation:

Taalcentrum VU

CBS Vertaalbureau

We would also like to thank the following members of staff at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for their feedback on a draft version of Dutch Trade in Facts and Figures:

Denise Brom

Harry Oldersma